South Africa’s Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe responded to U.S. aid threats by stating that South Africa might restrict mineral exports. He clarified that land expropriation occurs within a legal framework, rebuking accusations of confiscation. Mantashe called for stronger negotiation strategies for Africa’s resource-rich nations and highlighted global trade inequities. The South African Presidency denied Trump’s accusations, and Ramaphosa sought further dialogue with the U.S.
During the 2025 Investing in African Mining Indaba in Cape Town, South Africa’s Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources, Gwede Mantashe, responded to U.S. President Trump’s threats to cut aid by asserting that South Africa could retaliate by restricting its mineral exports. Mantashe condemned Trump’s assertions about land confiscation, clarifying that the Expropriation Act follows legal and constitutional protocols. He urged African nations to leverage their mineral wealth strategically in international negotiations, underscoring the continent’s prominence as a rich mining jurisdiction. In addition, he highlighted the disparities in global trade, noting the contrast between Africa’s raw resource exports and China’s value-added finished goods production. The South African Presidency released a statement to refute Trump’s claims, while President Cyril Ramaphosa expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue regarding land reform and other bilateral matters with the U.S.
The article examines tensions between South Africa and the United States regarding perceptions of land reform processes in South Africa. It highlights the legal frameworks surrounding land expropriation and emphasizes South Africa’s role as a significant producer of minerals. The broader context includes the economic relationship between Africa and nations that engage in resource extraction, particularly in light of trade imbalances between raw and finished goods.
Gwede Mantashe’s remarks highlight South Africa’s strategic posture in response to external pressures, particularly from the U.S. His emphasis on leveraging natural resources points to an effort to assert Africa’s agency in global trade discussions. Additionally, the response from the South African Presidency and President Ramaphosa’s invitation for dialogue suggest a commitment to address international concerns while promoting domestic policies.
Original Source: iafrica.com
